Welcome to adliterate
Adliterate is dedicated to providing radical thinking for the brand advice business.
It is concerned in the main by the future of advertising and the marketing communications industries, the impact of technology on communications and the nature of potent brands.
It takes a radical view in order to solve deep seated problems and it sets its self against orthodoxy in any form.
It also aims to be deliberately provocative.
Because life is more fun that way.
- It's 6pm in provincial Britain, time for children to stop shoplifting in jack wills and the hen dos to start
- That's where Barnes Wallis got the idea
http://t.co/jD0tKrxplV - The wife is concerned that the VW transporter has no vanity mirror, cup holders or iPod dock.
- If you can't get into Bowie at the V&A get membership - free entry, no need to book and this exhibition is worth the money on its own
- Swapped the 911 for a VW transporter for the w/e drives like a cow but just a tiny bit more practical #sensibleweekend
- Looks like the UKIP is going to have to change its name to the English Independence Party #niceonescotland
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- May 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- August 2005
- July 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
2 comments
kevin mclean says:
Mar 16, 2006
Interesting, but isn’t ‘Sky Sports’ a collection of channels? and Paramount too,c ome to that? Whereas the others are single channels? Maybe this just reinforces the point about the strength of the main terrestrial channels. If I were being really picky (and why not)I might think that the strength of the channel is in inverse proportion to its strength as a brand – if BBC1 is ‘for everyone/has everything’ what does it really stand for/what is its focus?
richard says:
Mar 17, 2006
I think that you have a point when it comes to looking at audience share but I’m not sure that when it comes to brand it matters.
But my point is more about how successful Sky Sports has been in comparison to the other brands in the Sky broadcasting portfolio. Sky Sports is a real brand on all sorts of criteria.
But that there aren’t really many real brands in the multichannel universe – i.e. channels that mean something to us rather than just carrying some programmes we quite like.
And this is critical because uncertainty about revenue models threaten the emergence of Brand Darwinism in the multichannel universe. Not that the broadcasters seem to have really woken up to this yet as they all rush to go free to air on Freeview and become ever more dependent on advertising revenue. Ultimately only real brands will survive on the EPG of any platforms because only real brands will be able to call for revenue directly from the consumer rather than through the advertiser.